<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complex Numbers for Rotating, Translating, and Scaling the Plane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/</link>
	<description>software development and consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>I agree with you if we are talking about arithmetic for real numbers and complex numbers.  We are not though.  We are talking about something altogether different.

This is not a statement about arithmetic.  It is a statement about geometry formalized with notation that makes it look like arithmetic.  If it helps, think of them just as 4-dimensional vectors: $$(a,b,c,d)$$ that add just like vectors add: $$(a,b,c,d) + (w,x,y,z) = (a+w,b+x,c+y,z+d)$$.  But, unlike vectors, they can also be multiplied to create new vectors.  The multiplication is such that: 

$$(s,0,0,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (sa,sb,sc,sd) = (a,b,c,d) \cdot (s,0,0,0)$$

$$(0,s,0,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sb,sa,-sd,sc)$$

$$(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,s,0,0) = (-sb,sa,sc,-sd)$$

$$(0,0,s,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sc,sd,sa,-sb)$$

$$(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,0,s,0) = (-sc,-sd,sa,sb)$$

$$(0,0,0,s) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sd,-sc,sb,sa)$$

$$(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,0,0,s) = (-sd,sc,-sb,sa)$$

And, any other product can be determined if we agree that this multiplication distributes over addition just like we&#039;re used to.  So,

$$(s,t,u,v) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = \left[(s,0,0,0) + (0,t,0,0) + (0,0,u,0) + (0,0,0,v)\right] \cdot (a,b,c,d)$$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you if we are talking about arithmetic for real numbers and complex numbers.  We are not though.  We are talking about something altogether different.</p>
<p>This is not a statement about arithmetic.  It is a statement about geometry formalized with notation that makes it look like arithmetic.  If it helps, think of them just as 4-dimensional vectors: <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(a,b,c,d)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(a,b,c,d)" /> that add just like vectors add: <img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%2B%20%28w%2Cx%2Cy%2Cz%29%20%3D%20%28a%2Bw%2Cb%2Bx%2Cc%2By%2Cz%2Bd%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(a,b,c,d) + (w,x,y,z) = (a+w,b+x,c+y,z+d)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(a,b,c,d) + (w,x,y,z) = (a+w,b+x,c+y,z+d)" />.  But, unlike vectors, they can also be multiplied to create new vectors.  The multiplication is such that: </p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28s%2C0%2C0%2C0%29%20%5Ccdot%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%3D%20%28sa%2Csb%2Csc%2Csd%29%20%3D%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%5Ccdot%20%28s%2C0%2C0%2C0%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(s,0,0,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (sa,sb,sc,sd) = (a,b,c,d) \cdot (s,0,0,0)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(s,0,0,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (sa,sb,sc,sd) = (a,b,c,d) \cdot (s,0,0,0)" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%280%2Cs%2C0%2C0%29%20%5Ccdot%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%3D%20%28-sb%2Csa%2C-sd%2Csc%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(0,s,0,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sb,sa,-sd,sc)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(0,s,0,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sb,sa,-sd,sc)" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%5Ccdot%20%280%2Cs%2C0%2C0%29%20%3D%20%28-sb%2Csa%2Csc%2C-sd%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,s,0,0) = (-sb,sa,sc,-sd)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,s,0,0) = (-sb,sa,sc,-sd)" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%280%2C0%2Cs%2C0%29%20%5Ccdot%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%3D%20%28-sc%2Csd%2Csa%2C-sb%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(0,0,s,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sc,sd,sa,-sb)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(0,0,s,0) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sc,sd,sa,-sb)" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%5Ccdot%20%280%2C0%2Cs%2C0%29%20%3D%20%28-sc%2C-sd%2Csa%2Csb%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,0,s,0) = (-sc,-sd,sa,sb)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,0,s,0) = (-sc,-sd,sa,sb)" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%280%2C0%2C0%2Cs%29%20%5Ccdot%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%3D%20%28-sd%2C-sc%2Csb%2Csa%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(0,0,0,s) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sd,-sc,sb,sa)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(0,0,0,s) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = (-sd,-sc,sb,sa)" /></p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%5Ccdot%20%280%2C0%2C0%2Cs%29%20%3D%20%28-sd%2Csc%2C-sb%2Csa%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,0,0,s) = (-sd,sc,-sb,sa)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(a,b,c,d) \cdot (0,0,0,s) = (-sd,sc,-sb,sa)" /></p>
<p>And, any other product can be determined if we agree that this multiplication distributes over addition just like we&#8217;re used to.  So,</p>
<p><img src="http://l.wordpress.com/latex.php?latex=%28s%2Ct%2Cu%2Cv%29%20%5Ccdot%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%28s%2C0%2C0%2C0%29%20%2B%20%280%2Ct%2C0%2C0%29%20%2B%20%280%2C0%2Cu%2C0%29%20%2B%20%280%2C0%2C0%2Cv%29%5Cright%5D%20%5Ccdot%20%28a%2Cb%2Cc%2Cd%29&#038;bg=FFFFCC&#038;fg=000000&#038;s=0" title="(s,t,u,v) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = \left[(s,0,0,0) + (0,t,0,0) + (0,0,u,0) + (0,0,0,v)\right] \cdot (a,b,c,d)" style="vertical-align:-20%;" class="tex" alt="(s,t,u,v) \cdot (a,b,c,d) = \left[(s,0,0,0) + (0,t,0,0) + (0,0,u,0) + (0,0,0,v)\right] \cdot (a,b,c,d)" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter L. Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter L. Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>There is no law of arithmetic which makes ij equal to anything but +1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no law of arithmetic which makes ij equal to anything but +1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>It is not possible for a number to have three square roots in the Complex numbers.  But, the quaternions are not in tge complex numbers.  In fact, there are infinitely many ways to map subsets of the quaternions down to the complex numbers.  Note, to that ij = -ji in the quaternions whereas all complex numbers commute under multiplication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not possible for a number to have three square roots in the Complex numbers.  But, the quaternions are not in tge complex numbers.  In fact, there are infinitely many ways to map subsets of the quaternions down to the complex numbers.  Note, to that ij = -ji in the quaternions whereas all complex numbers commute under multiplication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter L.Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter L.Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>I refer to the last sentence of my comments of 21 May 2011. &#039;In this way all n nth integer roots of complex numbers can be obtained&#039;. This indicates that it is not possible for there to be more than n nth roots of a complex number.  This has enormous implications for Hamilton&#039;s quaternion equation i^2=j^2=k^2=ijk=-1 where -1 seems to have three square roots i,j, and k, where k seems to be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I refer to the last sentence of my comments of 21 May 2011. &#8216;In this way all n nth integer roots of complex numbers can be obtained&#8217;. This indicates that it is not possible for there to be more than n nth roots of a complex number.  This has enormous implications for Hamilton&#8217;s quaternion equation i^2=j^2=k^2=ijk=-1 where -1 seems to have three square roots i,j, and k, where k seems to be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter L.Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter L.Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>Further to my comment of 21 May 2011, the complex number a+ib can be converted into an imaginary number by making a equal 0, and then substituting the Cotes format cos90+isin90 equalling 0+i. It will be recognised that cos180+isin180 equals -1, and cos360+isin360 equals i to the power of 4 which is +1. The same principle also applies for division 
cos45+isin45 equals the square root of i.  In this way the roots and powers of i, -i, +1 and -1 can be calculated all based on the Cotes format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my comment of 21 May 2011, the complex number a+ib can be converted into an imaginary number by making a equal 0, and then substituting the Cotes format cos90+isin90 equalling 0+i. It will be recognised that cos180+isin180 equals -1, and cos360+isin360 equals i to the power of 4 which is +1. The same principle also applies for division<br />
cos45+isin45 equals the square root of i.  In this way the roots and powers of i, -i, +1 and -1 can be calculated all based on the Cotes format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter L. Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter L. Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>To obtain the roots of the complex number a+ib you take the arcotangent below 90 degrees of the complex ratio a/b and then divide by the root required. The cotangent of the result will give one of the roots of the complex ratio. For the other roots you add 360 degrees and then 720 degrees on to the arcotangent. In this way all n  nth integer roots of complex numbers can be obtained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To obtain the roots of the complex number a+ib you take the arcotangent below 90 degrees of the complex ratio a/b and then divide by the root required. The cotangent of the result will give one of the roots of the complex ratio. For the other roots you add 360 degrees and then 720 degrees on to the arcotangent. In this way all n  nth integer roots of complex numbers can be obtained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford Algebras for Rotating, Scaling, and Translating Space :: nklein software</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Algebras for Rotating, Scaling, and Translating Space :: nklein software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] using complex numbers for rotating, translating, and scaling the plane [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using complex numbers for rotating, translating, and scaling the plane [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford Algebras for Rotating, Scaling, and Translating the Plane :: nklein software</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Algebras for Rotating, Scaling, and Translating the Plane :: nklein software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] numbers can be used to represent coordinates in the plane and how, once you&#8217;ve done that, complex arithmetic leads naturally to rotations, scalings, and translations of the plane. Today, we&#8217;re going to do the same with the Clifford algebra [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] numbers can be used to represent coordinates in the plane and how, once you&#8217;ve done that, complex arithmetic leads naturally to rotations, scalings, and translations of the plane. Today, we&#8217;re going to do the same with the Clifford algebra [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen that site.  I will check it out.

Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen that site.  I will check it out.</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rory</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/complex-numbers-for-rotating-translating-and-scaling-the-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=511#comment-94</guid>
		<description>This was a fun read-- have you checked out the website khanacademy.org? The guy on there is amazing at explaining basic math stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a fun read&#8211; have you checked out the website khanacademy.org? The guy on there is amazing at explaining basic math stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

