<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speedy Matrix Multiplication in Lisp, Again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nklein.com/2009/06/speedy-matrix-multiplication-in-lisp-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/speedy-matrix-multiplication-in-lisp-again/</link>
	<description>software development and consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leonardo</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/speedy-matrix-multiplication-in-lisp-again/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=629#comment-220</guid>
		<description>For comparison I have created a simple D (V1) version; it uses a matrix and an array, it&#039;s not the faster possible version.
You may compile it yourself with LDC (codepad runs it, but it doesn&#039;t use any optimization flags):
http://codepad.org/SxUHubIn
Email me if you have questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For comparison I have created a simple D (V1) version; it uses a matrix and an array, it&#8217;s not the faster possible version.<br />
You may compile it yourself with LDC (codepad runs it, but it doesn&#8217;t use any optimization flags):<br />
<a href="http://codepad.org/SxUHubIn" rel="nofollow">http://codepad.org/SxUHubIn</a><br />
Email me if you have questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://nklein.com/2009/06/speedy-matrix-multiplication-in-lisp-again/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nklein.com/?p=629#comment-150</guid>
		<description>As malkia noted in another thread, LispWorks has a few additional flags that keep it from wrapping single-precision floats so much.  With the addition of &lt;em&gt;(float 0) (safety 0)&lt;/em&gt;, the LispWorks time drops to 0.562 seconds with only 516 bytes allocated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As malkia noted in another thread, LispWorks has a few additional flags that keep it from wrapping single-precision floats so much.  With the addition of <em>(float 0) (safety 0)</em>, the LispWorks time drops to 0.562 seconds with only 516 bytes allocated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

